I had several thoughts and wanted to just go through a couple of things.
First on this blog someone tried to say the people of Gonzales don't care. I begged to differ with them, and through several means, and spearheaded by Mrs. Leifeste, this community raised enough PRIVATE money to pay for the damage caused by vandals in our city cemetery. Thank you Mrs. Leifeste for spearheading this.
I want to stress two things here.
1) This was PRIVATE money used for this project. Not a dime from our city tax dollars. I believe that's the way it should be. Even today I heard a commercial for a private cemetery and they talked about perpetual care basically covered lawn maintenance. I even went to the state laws and the Texas Cemeteries Association and they both state headstones are not covered in perpetual care.
2) It's nice to see that even though the nay sayers swore it wouldn't happen, that the people of Gonzales have done what good citizens do, we took care of those things that needed to be taken care of even without the government getting into the middle of it. You go Gonzales!
Next, Monday is the final day to file for elections in our city. We've had 2 file for mayor. I hope it's a race on issues, not on personality. I think it's good for Gonzales to have people running for mayor. Who knows, maybe there will be more than the 2 by Monday. It will also be interesting to see who files in 4.
Reminder that Wednesday we have a new stop light in Gonzales. It's long past due and hopefully this will prevent some of the major accidents we've seen recently at that intersection at the new HEB and Tiger Tote. All the truck traffic coming out of industrial park has been an issue for years.
I know in conjunction with that I'm excited about the new HEB opening up in just a couple of weeks.
Is anyone else tired of seeing St. George torn up? Now don't get me wrong, I know the guys working on it haven't been on it terribly long, but the entire project has got to of been one of the worst managed projects ever. I'm hoping we're down to the end of this project and we can wipe it off our list.
Last is that 2/28 is a budget meeting. No no one showed up for the last one except our council members. While they might appreciate the quiet, the citizens should take an interest in what's going on. The proposed budget is in the city office and I believe a copy is in the library for public inspection. It would be nice to see and hear from a few concerned citizens at the meeting.
God Bless,
Dennis
Monday, February 27, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Reflections
Normally I leave reflections to my other blog My Journey of Enlightenment but considering I'm going to do so here.
It was 1 year ago this month that the world as Gonzales knew it started to go through one of the most turmoil of times. A very split council, lots of accusations, lots of people upset, and it didn't matter where you stood politically you weren't very happy with what was going on in our city government.
We had issues from our council all the way down to several employees within our city. We had state agencies coming in from TCEQ, Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas Rangers, LCRA, and others all not happy with the city of Gonzales. Many of them speaking at our council meetings letting us know we were dropping the balls in many areas.
I went to the council meeting last week and afterwards I reflected where we are today.
We've made HUGE changes in management. We've made huge stride (not that there isn't further to go - but give credit where it's due) in working transparently in our city. We've replace several employees that were either crooked or over their heads.
JB Wells is on the rebound. Our concessions are making money (how? we leased them out). We are actually charging for the services we were suppose to be charging for. We aren't financially bleeding the citizens of Gonzales dry over a rodeo arena.
Our city manager is letting the council know BEFORE contracts are being entered into, and asking their blessing, rather than trying to fly below the radar, even when he has the authority to sign the contracts already. We have public access to all checks written. He manages our city AND still goes out and listens to what the citizens are doing in social functions (something some of the previous managers didn't do).
We have a new financial officer. This one is brand new, but the fact that the old one who failed to reply to Tx Unemployment on time, failed to report proper income, failed to give the department managers timely and CORRECT information is gone is a blessing. The interim found undeclared deposits, accounts improperly posted, and helped get the accounting system on track, something that was always 'in the pile' for the previous one.
I see a council that actually can get along and not only be civil, but can exchange thoughts and ideas for the first time in probably 6 - 8 years. They've grown one of our biggest assets, Victoria College. They've brought new business in, and the rumblings I hear under the surface is that several more businesses, places for adults and our teenagers can work have either purchased or are looking for places to move into Gonzales. That's not counting the surveying stakes across the street from HEB where a Super Walmart is suppose to move in. Hotels, restaurants, and other businesses all looking and/or moving in.
A year ago I'm not sure I would of thought we would be here so quickly. I figured our council would still be bickering, and we'd still be figuring our way out of all the mess we were standing in last February.
Do we have more to go? Oh my, you bet we do! But as we continue to move forward, let's not forget what all has been accomplished. Let's remember that we were knee deep in alligators and honestly not very marketable to an outsider, and let's NOT go back that way again.
I know there are still a handful of tough issues the council and our city manager has to cross off their list. Not fun ones. But I have confidence when I reflect back in another year we can once again be better off than we are today.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
It was 1 year ago this month that the world as Gonzales knew it started to go through one of the most turmoil of times. A very split council, lots of accusations, lots of people upset, and it didn't matter where you stood politically you weren't very happy with what was going on in our city government.
We had issues from our council all the way down to several employees within our city. We had state agencies coming in from TCEQ, Texas Parks and Wildlife, Texas Rangers, LCRA, and others all not happy with the city of Gonzales. Many of them speaking at our council meetings letting us know we were dropping the balls in many areas.
I went to the council meeting last week and afterwards I reflected where we are today.
We've made HUGE changes in management. We've made huge stride (not that there isn't further to go - but give credit where it's due) in working transparently in our city. We've replace several employees that were either crooked or over their heads.
JB Wells is on the rebound. Our concessions are making money (how? we leased them out). We are actually charging for the services we were suppose to be charging for. We aren't financially bleeding the citizens of Gonzales dry over a rodeo arena.
Our city manager is letting the council know BEFORE contracts are being entered into, and asking their blessing, rather than trying to fly below the radar, even when he has the authority to sign the contracts already. We have public access to all checks written. He manages our city AND still goes out and listens to what the citizens are doing in social functions (something some of the previous managers didn't do).
We have a new financial officer. This one is brand new, but the fact that the old one who failed to reply to Tx Unemployment on time, failed to report proper income, failed to give the department managers timely and CORRECT information is gone is a blessing. The interim found undeclared deposits, accounts improperly posted, and helped get the accounting system on track, something that was always 'in the pile' for the previous one.
I see a council that actually can get along and not only be civil, but can exchange thoughts and ideas for the first time in probably 6 - 8 years. They've grown one of our biggest assets, Victoria College. They've brought new business in, and the rumblings I hear under the surface is that several more businesses, places for adults and our teenagers can work have either purchased or are looking for places to move into Gonzales. That's not counting the surveying stakes across the street from HEB where a Super Walmart is suppose to move in. Hotels, restaurants, and other businesses all looking and/or moving in.
A year ago I'm not sure I would of thought we would be here so quickly. I figured our council would still be bickering, and we'd still be figuring our way out of all the mess we were standing in last February.
Do we have more to go? Oh my, you bet we do! But as we continue to move forward, let's not forget what all has been accomplished. Let's remember that we were knee deep in alligators and honestly not very marketable to an outsider, and let's NOT go back that way again.
I know there are still a handful of tough issues the council and our city manager has to cross off their list. Not fun ones. But I have confidence when I reflect back in another year we can once again be better off than we are today.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Reporting of Committees
At the council meeting this last week a gentleman stood up during public comments and complained because a plan that was submitted to the Beautification committee was rejected (for this purpose it doesn't matter why), and when he tried to get records from the committee meeting he was informed that we have no such records in our city for any of our committees.
While that's not exactly right, GADC, the Zoning Board, and a couple of others keep and maintain records, it is so that most have no reporting to the city what so ever.
So straight from the Open Meetings Handbook 2012, page 12 -
D. Committees and Subcommittees of Governmental Bodies
Generally, meetings of less than a quorum of a governmental body are not subject to the Act.70 However, when a governmental body appoints a committee that includes less than a quorum of the parent body and grants it authority to supervise or control public business or public policy, the committee may itself be a “governmental body” subject to the Act.71
Our committees definitely fall into the 'less than a quorum' since I've never seen our council members appointed to these committees. But they most definitely ARE given permission and authority to supervise and control public business and public policy.
In September I wrote about the need for our committees to report to the council on a regular basis. read here
I'm being told that there are committees meeting without proper notification to ALL members of the committees, that there are some that are basically committee in name only and that the 'elite few' just do whatever they want on these committees. When I spoke to Bob Burchard about some of his actions in the city and upsetting people by those doing things (things often related to committees he's on), and he told me "I didn't do it it wouldn't get done!"
Really?
So that means that you can circumvent all the policy, procedures and laws that were set out to make sure that the public has say in our city and for a COMMITTEE (defined as - a group of persons elected or appointed to perform some service or function, as to investigate, report on, or act upon a particular matter). That the few don't dictate to the many. It's also that the council knows what's going on! The sad part is he's not alone in his attitude about committee work.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, our committees all work for the city council (who in turn works for the best interest of the people of Gonzales). They don't get free reign, and they have a obligation to keep the council and the citizens of this town informed as to where they spend any money and what policies they are dictating. As a courtesy to the council they also owe them a "what we're working on" so that the council can direct any actions that might be duplicated (or in some cases triplicated) or in contrary to the direction the council is trying to move our city.
I think our city needs to immediately inform all committees to insure they are following by certain rules, and while some of them are not laws, they are still courteous and transparent ways to operate -
1) All meetings times and places are posted on the city websites for all committees
2) A quorum must be present at all committee meetings for any votes of action to be taken
3) Minutes for all meetings must be posted with the city secretary within 3 business days following the next committee meeting (to give time to approve the minutes before posting - so most minute, just like our council minutes would be a month behind).
4) All committees must make a public report at least quarterly to the city council with general details of project status (what's been completed, and what are we working on) for the councils knowledge and direction.
Some of the committees have done an excellent job. But honestly I believe some of our committees have taken on a life of their own that were never intended. We as a public have a right to know what's going on in our committees. We have a right to be at any meeting of any committee. We have a right to have a say, even if we're not on the committee, just as we do with our elected officials. But the way it's set up right now, our citizens and our city council have no way of knowing what's going on in those committee meetings.
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
While that's not exactly right, GADC, the Zoning Board, and a couple of others keep and maintain records, it is so that most have no reporting to the city what so ever.
So straight from the Open Meetings Handbook 2012, page 12 -
D. Committees and Subcommittees of Governmental Bodies
Generally, meetings of less than a quorum of a governmental body are not subject to the Act.70 However, when a governmental body appoints a committee that includes less than a quorum of the parent body and grants it authority to supervise or control public business or public policy, the committee may itself be a “governmental body” subject to the Act.71
Our committees definitely fall into the 'less than a quorum' since I've never seen our council members appointed to these committees. But they most definitely ARE given permission and authority to supervise and control public business and public policy.
In September I wrote about the need for our committees to report to the council on a regular basis. read here
I'm being told that there are committees meeting without proper notification to ALL members of the committees, that there are some that are basically committee in name only and that the 'elite few' just do whatever they want on these committees. When I spoke to Bob Burchard about some of his actions in the city and upsetting people by those doing things (things often related to committees he's on), and he told me "I didn't do it it wouldn't get done!"
Really?
So that means that you can circumvent all the policy, procedures and laws that were set out to make sure that the public has say in our city and for a COMMITTEE (defined as - a group of persons elected or appointed to perform some service or function, as to investigate, report on, or act upon a particular matter). That the few don't dictate to the many. It's also that the council knows what's going on! The sad part is he's not alone in his attitude about committee work.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, our committees all work for the city council (who in turn works for the best interest of the people of Gonzales). They don't get free reign, and they have a obligation to keep the council and the citizens of this town informed as to where they spend any money and what policies they are dictating. As a courtesy to the council they also owe them a "what we're working on" so that the council can direct any actions that might be duplicated (or in some cases triplicated) or in contrary to the direction the council is trying to move our city.
I think our city needs to immediately inform all committees to insure they are following by certain rules, and while some of them are not laws, they are still courteous and transparent ways to operate -
1) All meetings times and places are posted on the city websites for all committees
2) A quorum must be present at all committee meetings for any votes of action to be taken
3) Minutes for all meetings must be posted with the city secretary within 3 business days following the next committee meeting (to give time to approve the minutes before posting - so most minute, just like our council minutes would be a month behind).
4) All committees must make a public report at least quarterly to the city council with general details of project status (what's been completed, and what are we working on) for the councils knowledge and direction.
Some of the committees have done an excellent job. But honestly I believe some of our committees have taken on a life of their own that were never intended. We as a public have a right to know what's going on in our committees. We have a right to be at any meeting of any committee. We have a right to have a say, even if we're not on the committee, just as we do with our elected officials. But the way it's set up right now, our citizens and our city council have no way of knowing what's going on in those committee meetings.
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
Monday, February 6, 2012
Today starts it off...
So today is the day you can go down to the city secretary and fill in your paper work to run in the May election.
Remember a few things...
1) Per city rules you must be registered to vote and live in that district(council member) / city(mayor) for 6 months. That means your voter registration card and drivers license have to match where you fall to sleep at since December 2011 (I did tell you that back in October).
2) It cost NOTHING to sign up. That's right, no expense what so ever to sign up to run.
3) There are no party affiliations for city races. You don't have to declare Republican or Democrat or other, as a matter of fact there is no where TO declare such an affiliation.
4) There are, by state law, financial forms that have to be filled out periodically, and you can get in big trouble if you don't.
5) There are guidelines for all signs, printed material, and advertisements that you put out that have to be maintained (Those little disclaimers, etc).
6) We have a wide open Mayoral race (meaning no incumbent) and 2 council seats (3 and 4) running this time.
7) Who is more qualified than YOU? You have ideas, you have talents, you have vision for this town? Then why aren't you running?
So get down to city hall today, ask for your application, sign up and let's have some good, clean exchange of ideas that will help the city grow.
And for the records, those of you who are seriously thinking about it, leave the crappy mud slinging for the mud wrestling shows in the big cities. We don't need to know who didn't wash their hands this morning, or who said what about who, or who did something 25 years ago...it's not pertinent to the issues at hand.
What are those? How are we going to continue our stride to a more transparent city government? How are we going to manage our money better so we don't have to borrow $6,000,000 in the future? How are we going to deal with the influx of people who are coming in the city right now? And how are we going to keep our infrastructure in good shape through all of this? How are we going to make JB Wells accountable and yet be the best little rodeo arena in Texas? Those are just a few of the issues at the top of my head right now.
That's what the voters of Gonzales want to hear about!
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Remember a few things...
1) Per city rules you must be registered to vote and live in that district(council member) / city(mayor) for 6 months. That means your voter registration card and drivers license have to match where you fall to sleep at since December 2011 (I did tell you that back in October).
2) It cost NOTHING to sign up. That's right, no expense what so ever to sign up to run.
3) There are no party affiliations for city races. You don't have to declare Republican or Democrat or other, as a matter of fact there is no where TO declare such an affiliation.
4) There are, by state law, financial forms that have to be filled out periodically, and you can get in big trouble if you don't.
5) There are guidelines for all signs, printed material, and advertisements that you put out that have to be maintained (Those little disclaimers, etc).
6) We have a wide open Mayoral race (meaning no incumbent) and 2 council seats (3 and 4) running this time.
7) Who is more qualified than YOU? You have ideas, you have talents, you have vision for this town? Then why aren't you running?
So get down to city hall today, ask for your application, sign up and let's have some good, clean exchange of ideas that will help the city grow.
And for the records, those of you who are seriously thinking about it, leave the crappy mud slinging for the mud wrestling shows in the big cities. We don't need to know who didn't wash their hands this morning, or who said what about who, or who did something 25 years ago...it's not pertinent to the issues at hand.
What are those? How are we going to continue our stride to a more transparent city government? How are we going to manage our money better so we don't have to borrow $6,000,000 in the future? How are we going to deal with the influx of people who are coming in the city right now? And how are we going to keep our infrastructure in good shape through all of this? How are we going to make JB Wells accountable and yet be the best little rodeo arena in Texas? Those are just a few of the issues at the top of my head right now.
That's what the voters of Gonzales want to hear about!
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I Hope Not
I just hope that any rumors about any newspaper in town giving discounts for political ads are totally incorrect.
§ 255.002. RATES FOR POLITICAL ADVERTISING. (a) The rate
charged for political advertising by a radio or television station
may not exceed:
(1) during the 45 days preceding a general or runoff
primary election and during the 60 days preceding a general or
special election, the broadcaster's lowest unit charge for
advertising of the same class, for the same time, and for the same
period; or
(2) at any time other than that specified by
Subdivision (1), the amount charged other users for comparable use
of the station.
(b) The rate charged for political advertising that is
printed or published may not exceed the lowest charge made for
comparable use of the space for any other purposes.
(c) In determining amounts charged for comparable use, the
amount and kind of space or time used, number of times used,
frequency of use, type of advertising copy submitted, and any other
relevant factors shall be considered.
(d) Discounts offered by a newspaper or magazine to its
commercial advertisers shall be offered on equal terms to
purchasers of political advertising from the newspaper or magazine.
(e) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly
demands or receives or knowingly pays or offers to pay for political
advertising more consideration than permitted by this section.
(f) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
All I'm going to say.
God Bless,
Dennis
§ 255.002. RATES FOR POLITICAL ADVERTISING. (a) The rate
charged for political advertising by a radio or television station
may not exceed:
(1) during the 45 days preceding a general or runoff
primary election and during the 60 days preceding a general or
special election, the broadcaster's lowest unit charge for
advertising of the same class, for the same time, and for the same
period; or
(2) at any time other than that specified by
Subdivision (1), the amount charged other users for comparable use
of the station.
(b) The rate charged for political advertising that is
printed or published may not exceed the lowest charge made for
comparable use of the space for any other purposes.
(c) In determining amounts charged for comparable use, the
amount and kind of space or time used, number of times used,
frequency of use, type of advertising copy submitted, and any other
relevant factors shall be considered.
(d) Discounts offered by a newspaper or magazine to its
commercial advertisers shall be offered on equal terms to
purchasers of political advertising from the newspaper or magazine.
(e) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly
demands or receives or knowingly pays or offers to pay for political
advertising more consideration than permitted by this section.
(f) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
All I'm going to say.
God Bless,
Dennis
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
May / Shall / Cemetery
Back in October or so we had some vandalism in the City Cemetery off of College Street. The vandals toppled over a couple of monuments that had been long standing. It's a sad a fare, and Ms. Wallace mentioned to the city council that she wasn't even aware if there were any living survivors to these who were buried there.
Mrs. Leifeste read letter to editor here has gone to the council requesting the council pay the $900 to have these monuments restored. In it she quoted State Law (Health & Safety Code, Title 8), "authorizes a municipality to regulate, improve, enclose and be a permanent trustee for the perpetual maintenance of the lots and graves in the cemetery."
The council rightly pointed out that just because it's 'authorized' didn't mean the city was in any way shape or form obligated to. There is a big difference being 'authorized' to do something and mandated to do something, and honestly our city has enough on it's plate without taking on perpetual care of our cemeteries. I personally believe that our city (both the staff and council) have taken the correct stance on this issue.
Now with that being said, it falls back to the citizens of Gonzales to take care of these things, NOT our city government. Several local citizens have already stepped up and pledged money to help cover the $900 cost of repairing the historical monuments in our cemetery. I believe we are over 30% in covering the cost, but need to hit 100% to get these repaired.
This blog averages about 500 hits a week. If everyone kicked in a couple of dollars this would be paid for immediately. Ok, but we know that's not going to happen. So I'm making an appeal to my readership to help out. Let's do what good citizens do in these cases, we take care of things. So far we've had donations from $25 - $100. But even $5 and $10 donations add up quickly, especially for the small amount we're talking about.
So if you're so inclined, please send donations to:
Solansky Monument Company
5233 US 183 North
Gonzales, TX 78629
Please annotate the check with "repair of vandalized stones" and if you'd like put a 'in memory of _______'.
When we reach the $900 Mr. Solanskys shop will do the work. The sooner we reach this the sooner the work can be done. Please consider making your donation today.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Mrs. Leifeste read letter to editor here has gone to the council requesting the council pay the $900 to have these monuments restored. In it she quoted State Law (Health & Safety Code, Title 8), "authorizes a municipality to regulate, improve, enclose and be a permanent trustee for the perpetual maintenance of the lots and graves in the cemetery."
The council rightly pointed out that just because it's 'authorized' didn't mean the city was in any way shape or form obligated to. There is a big difference being 'authorized' to do something and mandated to do something, and honestly our city has enough on it's plate without taking on perpetual care of our cemeteries. I personally believe that our city (both the staff and council) have taken the correct stance on this issue.
Now with that being said, it falls back to the citizens of Gonzales to take care of these things, NOT our city government. Several local citizens have already stepped up and pledged money to help cover the $900 cost of repairing the historical monuments in our cemetery. I believe we are over 30% in covering the cost, but need to hit 100% to get these repaired.
This blog averages about 500 hits a week. If everyone kicked in a couple of dollars this would be paid for immediately. Ok, but we know that's not going to happen. So I'm making an appeal to my readership to help out. Let's do what good citizens do in these cases, we take care of things. So far we've had donations from $25 - $100. But even $5 and $10 donations add up quickly, especially for the small amount we're talking about.
So if you're so inclined, please send donations to:
Solansky Monument Company
5233 US 183 North
Gonzales, TX 78629
Please annotate the check with "repair of vandalized stones" and if you'd like put a 'in memory of _______'.
When we reach the $900 Mr. Solanskys shop will do the work. The sooner we reach this the sooner the work can be done. Please consider making your donation today.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Monday, January 9, 2012
Back at it - Term Limits
Ok, vacation is good and all, but it's time to get back to work.
One of the things I've spoken about in the past, an in order NOT to cost the city additional money was withdrawn, was the need for Term Limits in Gonzales. So in a couple of weeks we will be releasing the petitions for this endeavor. We will need just over 400 registered voters in Gonzales to make this happen. The petition will read:
No person shall be eligible to hold the office of mayor or city council for more than four full terms, nor hold a total of more than of six terms in combined elected office, and shall not be placed on the ballot for election to any term if service for the full term would constitute a violation hereof.
Why do we believe term limits are needed?
1) Fresh Ideas - Anytime anyone has been in office to long their vision gets narrowed to what they've seen. Imagination goes out the window, and we get a bad case of 'that's how it's always been'.
2) 8 Years Is Enough - Ok, it takes a good year to get a good understanding of what you're doing on the council and how to make things happen, but if you can't get what you set out to achieve in 8 years do you really think you'll ever get it done? Let's be honest, you are more productive for the first couple of years than you'll be the rest of your career.
3) We've seen 2 corruptions cases prosecuted in our town, not to mention the probability of additional cases not prosecuted. Additionally corruption in our county government, and if you just look around in our neighbors you'll see dozens of cases of government corruption. That doesn't even cover things like the FBI sting in San Antonio or Austins council over the last decade. What do everyone of these have in common? Everyone of them have been in office for significant periods of time.
Currently the City of Gonzales has no term limits what so ever. The proposed limits are not very restrictive to be honest. 12 years total in office is a long time.
We know that there are those that are worried about who will run the city after term limits kick in. Honestly, it will be another group of men and women who care about the city. We've never had a vacancy because no one would run, and I promise it won't happen. There will always be someone to step up.
Last we want to point out that these limits do not apply retroactively to the current council. They will have the opportunity for an additional 6 years. Again, this is NOT retroactive. The timer would start May 2012. So this is NOT to kick anyone who is on the council off, this is to keep Gonzales growing and progressing in a positive manner.
God Bless,
Dennis
One of the things I've spoken about in the past, an in order NOT to cost the city additional money was withdrawn, was the need for Term Limits in Gonzales. So in a couple of weeks we will be releasing the petitions for this endeavor. We will need just over 400 registered voters in Gonzales to make this happen. The petition will read:
No person shall be eligible to hold the office of mayor or city council for more than four full terms, nor hold a total of more than of six terms in combined elected office, and shall not be placed on the ballot for election to any term if service for the full term would constitute a violation hereof.
Why do we believe term limits are needed?
1) Fresh Ideas - Anytime anyone has been in office to long their vision gets narrowed to what they've seen. Imagination goes out the window, and we get a bad case of 'that's how it's always been'.
2) 8 Years Is Enough - Ok, it takes a good year to get a good understanding of what you're doing on the council and how to make things happen, but if you can't get what you set out to achieve in 8 years do you really think you'll ever get it done? Let's be honest, you are more productive for the first couple of years than you'll be the rest of your career.
3) We've seen 2 corruptions cases prosecuted in our town, not to mention the probability of additional cases not prosecuted. Additionally corruption in our county government, and if you just look around in our neighbors you'll see dozens of cases of government corruption. That doesn't even cover things like the FBI sting in San Antonio or Austins council over the last decade. What do everyone of these have in common? Everyone of them have been in office for significant periods of time.
Currently the City of Gonzales has no term limits what so ever. The proposed limits are not very restrictive to be honest. 12 years total in office is a long time.
We know that there are those that are worried about who will run the city after term limits kick in. Honestly, it will be another group of men and women who care about the city. We've never had a vacancy because no one would run, and I promise it won't happen. There will always be someone to step up.
Last we want to point out that these limits do not apply retroactively to the current council. They will have the opportunity for an additional 6 years. Again, this is NOT retroactive. The timer would start May 2012. So this is NOT to kick anyone who is on the council off, this is to keep Gonzales growing and progressing in a positive manner.
God Bless,
Dennis
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
McMinns ReElection
I've been meaning to comment on the recent announcement in the Gonzales Cannon (I'm assuming the Inquirer also announced it) Mrs McMinn is running for re-election as our district attorney.
She throws all these facts about how she's gotten rid of all these back logged cases. My question is how many of them did she do NOTHING about? How many did she just dismiss and called them closed?
Mrs McMinn has been tough of drug users, I'll give her that, but she has refused to prosecute in ANY county anything of a political nature. She's afraid to take on the tough cases that truly impact you and I as citizens. If there is even a hint that there is a politician or a government agency involved she cringes and avoids it like the plague. Even the police officers just shake their heads when it comes to Mrs McMinn.
Her office has repeatedly lost paperwork filed by the department, and heaven forbid you actually need them to respond back to you, because that won't happen, especially not in writing.
So as a typical politician she's used the old adage "statistics lie and liars use statistics" for her campaign slogan. Don't let her babbling on about what she did fool you in not seeing what she hasn't done, especially for those counties outside of Caldwell.
She didn't prosecute our mayor when in her own words she felt there were issues, how long did Mr. Grant go and only when news media pelted her for it did anything get done there, but again, there were no penalties for violations of terms, she refused to hear several other cases of fraud in Gonzales County, and continues to live in her fantasy world.
I hope we'll all remember what Mrs McMinn DIDN'T do for us when they go to the poles next year.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
She throws all these facts about how she's gotten rid of all these back logged cases. My question is how many of them did she do NOTHING about? How many did she just dismiss and called them closed?
Mrs McMinn has been tough of drug users, I'll give her that, but she has refused to prosecute in ANY county anything of a political nature. She's afraid to take on the tough cases that truly impact you and I as citizens. If there is even a hint that there is a politician or a government agency involved she cringes and avoids it like the plague. Even the police officers just shake their heads when it comes to Mrs McMinn.
Her office has repeatedly lost paperwork filed by the department, and heaven forbid you actually need them to respond back to you, because that won't happen, especially not in writing.
So as a typical politician she's used the old adage "statistics lie and liars use statistics" for her campaign slogan. Don't let her babbling on about what she did fool you in not seeing what she hasn't done, especially for those counties outside of Caldwell.
She didn't prosecute our mayor when in her own words she felt there were issues, how long did Mr. Grant go and only when news media pelted her for it did anything get done there, but again, there were no penalties for violations of terms, she refused to hear several other cases of fraud in Gonzales County, and continues to live in her fantasy world.
I hope we'll all remember what Mrs McMinn DIDN'T do for us when they go to the poles next year.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Monday, December 12, 2011
$575,000
I saw a comment on my last post about the $575,000 that the city spent at the last city council meeting. Yes, they voted for $575,000, but in reality $400,000 of that was budgeted money that GEDC had put for the expansion at Victoria College. The additional $175,000 was unbudgeted.
Now it is my understanding that out of the old Quality parking lot/buildings, the college only gets the first building, nothing more. I don't know if it's on a perpetual lease, or we've given it to them or what, but I know they have full use of the building.
If I understand correctly the additional lots are hoping to be sold by the city to recoup some of their money and who knows, maybe even make a penny or two on that money. I guess that the cities GEDC or GADC could try to use it as dangling carrot to some new business that wanted to start up in town too, though I've not heard anything mentioned along those lines from anyone in the city.
Now we've spent $100,000s on items I don't understand. Things that are totally unnecessary (like the weather station at the airport) and things that are just wasteful (like approving the 5 minute video for $20,000+ - that did eventually go away, but not without serious issues being brought to light first). But there are things that I do believe we need to spend some money on.
Should they have been budgeted first? Yes, but in this case it was totally unforeseen, and we have to make allowances for these, much like the fire departments extra expenditures.
But as I was starting to say, there are something that we need in this town. And I'd like to say that Victoria College is just for our kids, so that they would have a chance, so they could have a career, so that we as a community would stop living at the lowest of standards, and be able to give our kids a better chance. But what I'm finding out is it's not just for our kids. I know a lot of 30+ year old people attending VC trying to better themselves. Right now most of them are in the medical fields, but there are others doing other things over there too, taking vocational classes, so they aren't making minimum wages.
When families in this community start lifting themselves up off the minimum wage job scale, the entire community benefits! Victoria College is the best hope 90% of our community has to EVER lift themselves above that level. It's an affordable way for local kids out of high school have to get their feet wet in the real world of studies, and not be paying $1500/hr for school. But more importantly VC offers vocational studies that our high schools should be providing, so that people can study to be a nurse, a welder, a truck driver, and a mechanic. If you have one of these skills you will ALWAYS have a job! It may not be the job you want, but you will always have a job. That's not something a majority of our youth or even older can say in Gonzales.
Do I wish there was a better way to come up with the $175,000? You bet. I wish one of our local businesses (or several of them) would of created an endowment for that purpose. But considering the options of building a new building (which was bid out at FAR more than the $575,000), or not have these classes, I think our council and GEDC did a great job - not something I say all the time.
I know originally they wanted over a $1,000,000 for that lot, they negotiated it down to 1/2. I know that it will clean up an eye sore on highway 90a. I know those who come out of that class will be ready to go to work making decent money. Win, win win.
I also know that we have a potential to win even more if the additional lots are sold to businesses that could produce additional jobs and value to our community.
Was it perfect? Nope. But it was a great expenditure of $175,000 from our council, and the $400,000 from GEDC.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Now it is my understanding that out of the old Quality parking lot/buildings, the college only gets the first building, nothing more. I don't know if it's on a perpetual lease, or we've given it to them or what, but I know they have full use of the building.
If I understand correctly the additional lots are hoping to be sold by the city to recoup some of their money and who knows, maybe even make a penny or two on that money. I guess that the cities GEDC or GADC could try to use it as dangling carrot to some new business that wanted to start up in town too, though I've not heard anything mentioned along those lines from anyone in the city.
Now we've spent $100,000s on items I don't understand. Things that are totally unnecessary (like the weather station at the airport) and things that are just wasteful (like approving the 5 minute video for $20,000+ - that did eventually go away, but not without serious issues being brought to light first). But there are things that I do believe we need to spend some money on.
Should they have been budgeted first? Yes, but in this case it was totally unforeseen, and we have to make allowances for these, much like the fire departments extra expenditures.
But as I was starting to say, there are something that we need in this town. And I'd like to say that Victoria College is just for our kids, so that they would have a chance, so they could have a career, so that we as a community would stop living at the lowest of standards, and be able to give our kids a better chance. But what I'm finding out is it's not just for our kids. I know a lot of 30+ year old people attending VC trying to better themselves. Right now most of them are in the medical fields, but there are others doing other things over there too, taking vocational classes, so they aren't making minimum wages.
When families in this community start lifting themselves up off the minimum wage job scale, the entire community benefits! Victoria College is the best hope 90% of our community has to EVER lift themselves above that level. It's an affordable way for local kids out of high school have to get their feet wet in the real world of studies, and not be paying $1500/hr for school. But more importantly VC offers vocational studies that our high schools should be providing, so that people can study to be a nurse, a welder, a truck driver, and a mechanic. If you have one of these skills you will ALWAYS have a job! It may not be the job you want, but you will always have a job. That's not something a majority of our youth or even older can say in Gonzales.
Do I wish there was a better way to come up with the $175,000? You bet. I wish one of our local businesses (or several of them) would of created an endowment for that purpose. But considering the options of building a new building (which was bid out at FAR more than the $575,000), or not have these classes, I think our council and GEDC did a great job - not something I say all the time.
I know originally they wanted over a $1,000,000 for that lot, they negotiated it down to 1/2. I know that it will clean up an eye sore on highway 90a. I know those who come out of that class will be ready to go to work making decent money. Win, win win.
I also know that we have a potential to win even more if the additional lots are sold to businesses that could produce additional jobs and value to our community.
Was it perfect? Nope. But it was a great expenditure of $175,000 from our council, and the $400,000 from GEDC.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Ethicly Speaking
So there were 2 issues that I am having a bit of a problem with involving Chief Crow. I want to stress, I don't think any laws were broken. But there is an ethical point of things that I believe have been crossed in these 2 issues.
The first is the investigation of missing funds from JB Wells. Now I have several problems with our own police department investigating these missing funds.
1) JB Wells funds were at times dropped off at the police station for safe keeping until the next business day where they would be turned into the city office. This leads to a conflict of interest when you start investigating your own people. It's hard to be truly objective when it's your own family, or in this case your own department are involved.
2) Even if the funds had not ever landed at the police station, we live in a small town. And I am just going to say it, there are those that are, and those that aren't. And if you are, then justice has a tendency to look a little different when it comes to you. No matter what the final report sent to the DA there will forever be a whisper in Gonzales about the one that got special treatment, or got away, or was the scapegoat because of the local police departments investigation. Now I want to stress, I'm not saying it will be so, but in this town it will still be the talk of the town as soon as the DA announces their decisions.
3) I know that the Texas Rangers were given the information, and the city council was told this to appease them that the investigation was going outside of our PD. I know that at least a couple of the council members were shocked to hear that GPD filed the report with the DAs office instead of the Rangers. This whole thing, 100% of EVERYTHING, should of been handed off to the Texas Rangers, impartial outside agency that has no ties to Gonzales or it's people.
Second is the handling of the JB Wells concession. Shortly after Mr. Maeler was fired, all of the concessionaire personnel were also fired and Sarah Tenberg was put in place to run it.
So what are my complaints here? Several
1) Why didn't we put an RFP out FIRST then after the award was given then we relieve the employees. We put the cart before the horse here.
2) Second, it's taken the city almost 2 months to get an RFP out, and now another month before the deadline. I'm hoping that they don't try to push the awarding of the contract out another month because of the shortage of time between the deadline and the next city council meeting. But without any bidding process, a private business was given an inside line to a potentially lucrative contract out at JB Wells.
3) Third, and here comes the small town politics, Mrs Tenberg is friends of the Crow family. Read #2 about private business and inside line.
Any laws broken that way? Not that I'm aware of, but poor ethical judgement was used here.
I've been arguing that the concessions needed to be sourced out for over a year now, and am happy that it's happening, but we did this all wrong, and once again the whispering underlying the whole thing is just incredible.
When are those in public office going to learn they need to be ethnically above board, and transparent in their actions that affect those they serve? In both of these cases Chief Crow has not been.
Again, I want to stress, I don't believe anything illegal has occurred. I just don't believe that the best interest of the City of Gonzales were considered when these actions were taken. That's just my opinion.
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
PS - I wish everyone in Gonzales the Happiest of Thanksgiving.
The first is the investigation of missing funds from JB Wells. Now I have several problems with our own police department investigating these missing funds.
1) JB Wells funds were at times dropped off at the police station for safe keeping until the next business day where they would be turned into the city office. This leads to a conflict of interest when you start investigating your own people. It's hard to be truly objective when it's your own family, or in this case your own department are involved.
2) Even if the funds had not ever landed at the police station, we live in a small town. And I am just going to say it, there are those that are, and those that aren't. And if you are, then justice has a tendency to look a little different when it comes to you. No matter what the final report sent to the DA there will forever be a whisper in Gonzales about the one that got special treatment, or got away, or was the scapegoat because of the local police departments investigation. Now I want to stress, I'm not saying it will be so, but in this town it will still be the talk of the town as soon as the DA announces their decisions.
3) I know that the Texas Rangers were given the information, and the city council was told this to appease them that the investigation was going outside of our PD. I know that at least a couple of the council members were shocked to hear that GPD filed the report with the DAs office instead of the Rangers. This whole thing, 100% of EVERYTHING, should of been handed off to the Texas Rangers, impartial outside agency that has no ties to Gonzales or it's people.
Second is the handling of the JB Wells concession. Shortly after Mr. Maeler was fired, all of the concessionaire personnel were also fired and Sarah Tenberg was put in place to run it.
So what are my complaints here? Several
1) Why didn't we put an RFP out FIRST then after the award was given then we relieve the employees. We put the cart before the horse here.
2) Second, it's taken the city almost 2 months to get an RFP out, and now another month before the deadline. I'm hoping that they don't try to push the awarding of the contract out another month because of the shortage of time between the deadline and the next city council meeting. But without any bidding process, a private business was given an inside line to a potentially lucrative contract out at JB Wells.
3) Third, and here comes the small town politics, Mrs Tenberg is friends of the Crow family. Read #2 about private business and inside line.
Any laws broken that way? Not that I'm aware of, but poor ethical judgement was used here.
I've been arguing that the concessions needed to be sourced out for over a year now, and am happy that it's happening, but we did this all wrong, and once again the whispering underlying the whole thing is just incredible.
When are those in public office going to learn they need to be ethnically above board, and transparent in their actions that affect those they serve? In both of these cases Chief Crow has not been.
Again, I want to stress, I don't believe anything illegal has occurred. I just don't believe that the best interest of the City of Gonzales were considered when these actions were taken. That's just my opinion.
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
PS - I wish everyone in Gonzales the Happiest of Thanksgiving.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Cha-Ching
First Tuesday of the month was last night, so that means that our city council was in session and another chunk of unbudgeted change was approved for spending. No don't get me wrong, there are times we must spend unbudgeted money, and one of them was last night to an extent, but the rest? So here's the run down:
$48,000 in longevity bonuses for city employees. I have a couple of issues with this carte blanche bonus, though have to give Tommy Schrig props for trying to do it correctly.
This bonus is $4 a month for every month an employee has worked for the city up to 25 years. Now that includes Mr. Barnes who has worked for the city for 1 month. Councilman Schrig tried to pass it so that is applied to employees over 10 years. In my public working I've never seen one paid for any employee under 3 years. But not Gonzales. Why are we thanking those for their 'longevity' when they haven't proven any?
Additionally Councilman Hernandez asked about the handful of employees that within the last 2 years have gotten pay raises of over 25% and if they too would get the bonus. Oh yeah they will.
So why didn't the council table this motion till these issues could be sorted out? Had the city manager bring back a revised proposal that would truly benefit those who deserve something, yet not double dip those who have already benefited AND those who haven't earned it yet? I'm at a lose as to why our council is so quick to pass everything that comes before them.
Now the fire department asked for $10,000 in additional funds for unforeseen expenses, primarily due to the additional use they've gotten this year. My ONLY complaint is that we should have in our budget some of this additional repair items. We know that repair cost are never going to be what we thought they'd be. And heads up, for the next couple of years while this drought continues our fire department is going to need more money! Let's get it planned for now. I know it's not one of those expenses anyone wants to pay for, until that fire is at your house, but we've got to, and these firemen have busted their own tails raising money themselves too.
Now in one breath we heard (though I haven't seen the ytd/budgeted finances to confirm) that we have a windfall of cash from increased tax revenues and oil, and then in the next breath heard we would be going out for bonds to pay for the issuance of bonds for the money we need to make things work.
What I didn't hear is anything on the St. George debacle. Why after 2 year 4 months we still don't have finished streets.
I didn't hear one committee update from any boards / committees.
And with the exception of 2 out of 13 items, I heard NO discussion of ANY of the issues brought before council. I heard next item, motion, aye, aye, aye, aye, aye, next item repeat above.
For those interested, the second item discussed was when Mr. Hernandez asked the city manager to work with the failed petition on garage sale issue to come up with a compromise even though the petition didn't hit the 400+ signatures the city is saying were needed. This will come back up in December for modifications to the garage sale ordinance. So if you're interested be there in December to speak your peace.
God Bless
$48,000 in longevity bonuses for city employees. I have a couple of issues with this carte blanche bonus, though have to give Tommy Schrig props for trying to do it correctly.
This bonus is $4 a month for every month an employee has worked for the city up to 25 years. Now that includes Mr. Barnes who has worked for the city for 1 month. Councilman Schrig tried to pass it so that is applied to employees over 10 years. In my public working I've never seen one paid for any employee under 3 years. But not Gonzales. Why are we thanking those for their 'longevity' when they haven't proven any?
Additionally Councilman Hernandez asked about the handful of employees that within the last 2 years have gotten pay raises of over 25% and if they too would get the bonus. Oh yeah they will.
So why didn't the council table this motion till these issues could be sorted out? Had the city manager bring back a revised proposal that would truly benefit those who deserve something, yet not double dip those who have already benefited AND those who haven't earned it yet? I'm at a lose as to why our council is so quick to pass everything that comes before them.
Now the fire department asked for $10,000 in additional funds for unforeseen expenses, primarily due to the additional use they've gotten this year. My ONLY complaint is that we should have in our budget some of this additional repair items. We know that repair cost are never going to be what we thought they'd be. And heads up, for the next couple of years while this drought continues our fire department is going to need more money! Let's get it planned for now. I know it's not one of those expenses anyone wants to pay for, until that fire is at your house, but we've got to, and these firemen have busted their own tails raising money themselves too.
Now in one breath we heard (though I haven't seen the ytd/budgeted finances to confirm) that we have a windfall of cash from increased tax revenues and oil, and then in the next breath heard we would be going out for bonds to pay for the issuance of bonds for the money we need to make things work.
What I didn't hear is anything on the St. George debacle. Why after 2 year 4 months we still don't have finished streets.
I didn't hear one committee update from any boards / committees.
And with the exception of 2 out of 13 items, I heard NO discussion of ANY of the issues brought before council. I heard next item, motion, aye, aye, aye, aye, aye, next item repeat above.
For those interested, the second item discussed was when Mr. Hernandez asked the city manager to work with the failed petition on garage sale issue to come up with a compromise even though the petition didn't hit the 400+ signatures the city is saying were needed. This will come back up in December for modifications to the garage sale ordinance. So if you're interested be there in December to speak your peace.
God Bless
Monday, October 31, 2011
Elections in Texas - 10 Amendments
Many may not realize but we have 10 amendments on our ballot right now and elections are open in Texas. Early voting ends this Friday with election next Tuesday (November 8th). Traditionally off year propositions are all passed, because only those that are for the amendments go vote. The rest either are unaware, uneducated, or just don't care about the propositions.
This year there are billions (yes really billions) of dollars at stake, along with more and more government. Is it really a year not to care and be knowledgeable on what's on the ballots.
The following explanations and basic explanation is from Vote Texas. I have 2 writings from We Texans in there that wrote anything I could of said much clearer. There are just a couple of these that seriously are complicated and making them even more complicated. The rest I've added my 2 cents in for all it's worth. Most of these amendments need to go down in flames, but come Tuesday, unless you and I and our fellow Texans get out to vote they will pass.
So pass the word, get the neighbors to vote and let's tell Austin to start doing their jobs and taking care of business!
Dennis's Note - I'm a veteran and and advise I give here would be very bias. I'll let you decide.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran."
Dennis's Note - I'm not keen on any additional $6B that our state wants to add to our debt, especially a revolving account with no time limitations on it.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $6 billion at any time outstanding.”
Dennis's Note - Ok, I'm not a believer our system needs more money thrown at it. I'm a believer that our entire education system needs revamping. We could drain ever penny we have in this current system and get no better results. This is NOT a comment on our teachers, but on the curriculum and methods that are given to them to teach. Until our state gets that straight, we are just pissing money down the drain, and we would add to that if this passes.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds of the State of Texas to finance educational loans to students.”
Dennis's Note - Under current law, cities are authorized to use property tax revenue to secure loans to fund the development of blighted areas. This proposal would extend that authority to counties. So groups are concerned that the counties could use this for eminent domain abuse.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit a county to issue bonds or notes to finance the development or redevelopment of an unproductive, underdeveloped, or blighted area and to pledge for repayment of the bonds or notes increases in ad valorem taxes imposed by the county on property in the area. The amendment does not provide authority for increasing ad valorem tax rates."
We Texans Note - Currently, cities and counties may not create debt unless a tax is levied that is sufficient to pay the principle and interest on the debt. Cities and counties frequently enter into “interlocal contracts” whose term is less than one year because the costs associated with those agreements are funded from the current budget. To enter into a contract that extends beyond the current year would have the effect of creating a debt that will carry to future tax years. Debt of that type should require voter approval on a case by case basis and not be permitted unilaterally through a constitutional amendment. (They said it clearer than I could)
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to allow cities or counties to enter into interlocal contracts with other cities or counties without the imposition of a tax or the provision of a sinking fund."
Dennis's Note - Right now the state has money set aside for our kids educations. They are allowed to spend 6% of that money every year, with the thought that they will make at least that must between years. This is a common practice and secures financing for things like education. If we allow them to draw down the principal then eventually we will have $0 in the fund and guess what, they'll be looking for our tax money to build it back up.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment clarifying references to the permanent school fund, allowing the General Land Office to distribute revenue from permanent school fund land or other properties to the available school fund to provide additional funding for public education, and providing for an increase in the market value of the permanent school fund for the purpose of allowing increased distributions from the available school fund."
Dennis's Note - Don't we have enough taxing authorities already? The city and county already have authority to tax. Now we really want to create another entity to tax us and have to watch over?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."
Dennis's Note - This would make Parks and Wildlife responsible for determining property tax appraisal qualifications for water stewardship. Really? Parks and Wildlife now need to get into our tax appraisals? What are they doing up in Austin?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment providing for the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of open-space land devoted to water-stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity."
Dennis's Note - The problem is that the Texas Constitution allows the governor to grant reprieves, commutes and pardons for convictions, but only for convictions. And our laws have loop holes that leave those that who received deferred adjudication so that employers and others can still pull records and hold them against those who the judge never intended too. Instead of adding another loop hole, why doesn't Austin fix this properly?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the governor to grant a pardon to a person who successfully completes a term of deferred adjudication community supervision."
We Texans Note -The “resign-to-run” provision was added to the Texas Constitution in 1958 and was designed to insure officeholders gave their undivided attention to the duties of their office rather than campaigning while in the middle of their term. The provision created an automatic resignation for elected officials who began their campaign for a new office with more than one year remaining in their current term
Terms for these officials end December 31. Previously, with filing deadlines in January, officials could announce their candidacy for another office on Jan. 1 or 2 and continue to serve the remainder of their current term. In order to insure adequate time to send ballots to military and overseas voters, the filing deadline has been moved from Jan. 2 to the second Monday in December. This provision would extend the provision so that an automatic resignation was not triggered unless the candidate began their campaign more than one year and 30 days before the expiration of their current term.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to change the length of the unexpired term that causes the automatic resignation of certain elected county or district officeholders if they become candidates for another office.
This year there are billions (yes really billions) of dollars at stake, along with more and more government. Is it really a year not to care and be knowledgeable on what's on the ballots.
The following explanations and basic explanation is from Vote Texas. I have 2 writings from We Texans in there that wrote anything I could of said much clearer. There are just a couple of these that seriously are complicated and making them even more complicated. The rest I've added my 2 cents in for all it's worth. Most of these amendments need to go down in flames, but come Tuesday, unless you and I and our fellow Texans get out to vote they will pass.
So pass the word, get the neighbors to vote and let's tell Austin to start doing their jobs and taking care of business!
Proposition Number 1 (SJR 14)
SJR 14 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to provide the surviving spouse of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran with an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the surviving spouse’s residence homestead as long as the surviving spouse has not remarried, the property was the residence homestead of the surviving spouse when the qualifying veteran died, and the property remains the residence homestead of the surviving spouse.Dennis's Note - I'm a veteran and and advise I give here would be very bias. I'll let you decide.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for an exemption from ad valorem taxation of all or part of the market value of the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran."
Proposition Number 2 (SJR 4)
SJR 4 would amend the constitution to authorize the Texas Water Development Board to issue additional general obligation bonds on a continuing basis for one or more accounts of the Texas Water Development Fund II, with the restriction that the total amount of bonds outstanding at any time does not exceed $6 billion.Dennis's Note - I'm not keen on any additional $6B that our state wants to add to our debt, especially a revolving account with no time limitations on it.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $6 billion at any time outstanding.”
Proposition Number 3 (SJR 50)
SJR 50 would amend the constitution to authorize the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board or its successors to issue and sell general obligation bonds on a continuing basis for the purpose of financing educational loans for students, subject to certain constitutional restrictions, including a restriction as to the maximum principal amount of bonds outstanding at any one time.Dennis's Note - Ok, I'm not a believer our system needs more money thrown at it. I'm a believer that our entire education system needs revamping. We could drain ever penny we have in this current system and get no better results. This is NOT a comment on our teachers, but on the curriculum and methods that are given to them to teach. Until our state gets that straight, we are just pissing money down the drain, and we would add to that if this passes.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of general obligation bonds of the State of Texas to finance educational loans to students.”
Proposition Number 4 (HJR 63)
HJR 63 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to permit a county to issue bonds or notes to finance the development or redevelopment of an unproductive, underdeveloped, or blighted area within the county, and to pledge increases in ad valorem tax revenues imposed on property in the area by the county for repayment of such bonds or notes. The amendment does not provide independent authority for increasing ad valorem tax rates.Dennis's Note - Under current law, cities are authorized to use property tax revenue to secure loans to fund the development of blighted areas. This proposal would extend that authority to counties. So groups are concerned that the counties could use this for eminent domain abuse.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit a county to issue bonds or notes to finance the development or redevelopment of an unproductive, underdeveloped, or blighted area and to pledge for repayment of the bonds or notes increases in ad valorem taxes imposed by the county on property in the area. The amendment does not provide authority for increasing ad valorem tax rates."
Proposition Number 5 (SJR 26)
SJR 26 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to allow cities and counties to enter into interlocal contracts with other cities and counties without having to assess an ad valorem tax and set aside a specified amount of funds for the payment of costs under the interlocal contract.We Texans Note - Currently, cities and counties may not create debt unless a tax is levied that is sufficient to pay the principle and interest on the debt. Cities and counties frequently enter into “interlocal contracts” whose term is less than one year because the costs associated with those agreements are funded from the current budget. To enter into a contract that extends beyond the current year would have the effect of creating a debt that will carry to future tax years. Debt of that type should require voter approval on a case by case basis and not be permitted unilaterally through a constitutional amendment. (They said it clearer than I could)
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to allow cities or counties to enter into interlocal contracts with other cities or counties without the imposition of a tax or the provision of a sinking fund."
Proposition Number 6 (HJR 109)
HJR 109 would amend the constitution to increase the amount of principal that is available for withdrawal from the permanent school fund each year and would also clarify certain references to that fund in the constitution. Increased access to the principal of the state public education trust fund would be based upon HJR 109 granting the authority to consider alternative market calculations when determining the amount of principal that is available for distribution to the available school fund. HJR 109 would also provide authority to distribute to the available school fund annual revenue from school fund land or other properties up to $300 million per year.Dennis's Note - Right now the state has money set aside for our kids educations. They are allowed to spend 6% of that money every year, with the thought that they will make at least that must between years. This is a common practice and secures financing for things like education. If we allow them to draw down the principal then eventually we will have $0 in the fund and guess what, they'll be looking for our tax money to build it back up.
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment clarifying references to the permanent school fund, allowing the General Land Office to distribute revenue from permanent school fund land or other properties to the available school fund to provide additional funding for public education, and providing for an increase in the market value of the permanent school fund for the purpose of allowing increased distributions from the available school fund."
Proposition Number 7 (SJR 28)
SJR 28 would amend the constitution by adding El Paso County to the list of counties authorized to create conservation and reclamation districts to develop parks and recreational facilities financed by taxes.Dennis's Note - Don't we have enough taxing authorities already? The city and county already have authority to tax. Now we really want to create another entity to tax us and have to watch over?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities."
Proposition Number 8 (SJR 16)
SJR 16 would amend the constitution by requiring the legislature to provide for taxation of open space land devoted to water stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity.Dennis's Note - This would make Parks and Wildlife responsible for determining property tax appraisal qualifications for water stewardship. Really? Parks and Wildlife now need to get into our tax appraisals? What are they doing up in Austin?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment providing for the appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes of open-space land devoted to water-stewardship purposes on the basis of its productive capacity."
Proposition Number 9 (SJR 9)
SJR 9 would amend the constitution to authorize the governor, on the written recommendation and advice of the Board of Pardons and Paroles, to grant a pardon, reprieve, or commutation of punishment to a person who successfully completes a term of deferred adjudication community supervision.Dennis's Note - The problem is that the Texas Constitution allows the governor to grant reprieves, commutes and pardons for convictions, but only for convictions. And our laws have loop holes that leave those that who received deferred adjudication so that employers and others can still pull records and hold them against those who the judge never intended too. Instead of adding another loop hole, why doesn't Austin fix this properly?
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment authorizing the governor to grant a pardon to a person who successfully completes a term of deferred adjudication community supervision."
Proposition Number 10 (SJR 37)
SJR 37 would amend the constitution by extending the length of the unexpired term that causes the automatic resignation of certain local elected officeholders if they announce candidacy or become candidates for another office from one year to one year and 30 days.We Texans Note -The “resign-to-run” provision was added to the Texas Constitution in 1958 and was designed to insure officeholders gave their undivided attention to the duties of their office rather than campaigning while in the middle of their term. The provision created an automatic resignation for elected officials who began their campaign for a new office with more than one year remaining in their current term
The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: "The constitutional amendment to change the length of the unexpired term that causes the automatic resignation of certain elected county or district officeholders if they become candidates for another office.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
District Champs
Congratulations Apaches Football for holding off the La Vernia Bears and becoming the District 28-3A Champs.
Cuero is next, and I think this last game was a wake up call for the tribe to not assume your opponents are going to roll over and play dead. So with that in mind I think we'll have plenty of turkeys for Thanksgiving after next weekend.
After that it's on to the play-offs. But let's get past Cuero first.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Generally we've had great offenses with decent defenses, not this year. This year we've got an outstanding defense tagging with a great offense. This is the real deal, all round team.
I was a bit worried after we smacked Sam Houston that our boys would get a big head and stumble this week, but coach obviously keep the boys heads in the game, and not looking forward to the next game before we get there.
They've played as a team, and as a team I think they will go far. Without a doubt this is the best team I've ever seen play for the Apaches.
Good luck to them as they continue on, I know we still have La Vernia next week, but this will be an great year to end up in Cuero. Thinking there will be some gobblers ducking from the Apache tomahawks. :) One week at a time though!
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
Friday, October 21, 2011
2 out of 3 or 3 out of 4 depending
Well I have been working overtime this week and didn't get a chance to write, and honestly the newspaper beat me to the punchline, at least part of it.
First I'd like to know why 2 of the people removed from city positions names were release immediately to the public, and one of them couldn't be release till this week? Why was Belinda Walkers name withheld when the original statements were made when both Billy Malaer and Ricky Bazans names were released immediately? Does it have anything to do with her family? If not what then? I can say in all my probes no one can tell me why this one was specifically excluded and the city was unable to let us know who Belinda offically was until now.
Then I see where Mr. Cavazos is retiring. Now I've made it clear that I thought he should of been shown the door 10 minutes after Mr. Malaer. If we were going to release Mr Malaer for lack of confidence then what the heck did we have in Mr Cavazos? Why was he given any more opportunity than any of the other employees that were shown the front door? If Mr. Cavazos had been doing his job we'd be much better off financially then we are today. I'm not talking 10s of dollars, but 100,000s of dollars. Mr Cavazos was the only person who could of and was obligated to come before the council with the problems that were happening in our books. He was responsible for all checks and balances and procedures for money handling. He had a responsibility as a city employee AND CPA!
Now the positive spin on all this, while I'm not certain if all the problem issues are taken care of, we have an opportunity to turn things around! It's not going to be easy, and honestly it's easier to keep everything as is rather than make the necessary changes. But the opportunity is NOW to make those changes. We have a new city manager that has already made some changes, and hopefully will be leading the way for more changes. Some in personnel, some in procedures, some in the way we think about city employees. Let's make positive change in this town, bring life back to it, and have a place that is no longer a laughing stock of those looking in, but a place to be proud to say you're from!
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
First I'd like to know why 2 of the people removed from city positions names were release immediately to the public, and one of them couldn't be release till this week? Why was Belinda Walkers name withheld when the original statements were made when both Billy Malaer and Ricky Bazans names were released immediately? Does it have anything to do with her family? If not what then? I can say in all my probes no one can tell me why this one was specifically excluded and the city was unable to let us know who Belinda offically was until now.
Then I see where Mr. Cavazos is retiring. Now I've made it clear that I thought he should of been shown the door 10 minutes after Mr. Malaer. If we were going to release Mr Malaer for lack of confidence then what the heck did we have in Mr Cavazos? Why was he given any more opportunity than any of the other employees that were shown the front door? If Mr. Cavazos had been doing his job we'd be much better off financially then we are today. I'm not talking 10s of dollars, but 100,000s of dollars. Mr Cavazos was the only person who could of and was obligated to come before the council with the problems that were happening in our books. He was responsible for all checks and balances and procedures for money handling. He had a responsibility as a city employee AND CPA!
Now the positive spin on all this, while I'm not certain if all the problem issues are taken care of, we have an opportunity to turn things around! It's not going to be easy, and honestly it's easier to keep everything as is rather than make the necessary changes. But the opportunity is NOW to make those changes. We have a new city manager that has already made some changes, and hopefully will be leading the way for more changes. Some in personnel, some in procedures, some in the way we think about city employees. Let's make positive change in this town, bring life back to it, and have a place that is no longer a laughing stock of those looking in, but a place to be proud to say you're from!
God Bless
Dennis Nesser
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
The Lie of the Museum District
So this spring our council approved a 'Museum District" for a section of downtown and up through the museums and log cabin. There were articles about it in both papers I believe.
Now before these came to a vote by our council I asked Mr. Bob Burchard about this district. He very specifically told me that this was a name only designation, and would carry absolutely NO regulatory connotations to it. I told him I was concerned that this would be used to try to take away property owners rights in that district. "Absolutely not" was Mr. Burchards' response to me.
Later that night at that city council meeting Mrs Glenda Gordon told the council that this was purely a designation that would hold no regulatory connotations. There were several of the council members that weren't exactly for this designation, but felt that since it was purely in name only it would be ok. This then would go to our state legislators so that we would be designated the first "museum district" in Texas. What a great marketing campaign. That's ALL it was suppose to be, a marketing ploy!
So I'm going to just put it as clear as I can, we were lied to! Mrs. Gordon, the same person who brought this designation to the council, has since used the museum district designation to try to close down a new business in that district, the recycling center on St. Louis.
Per the Gonzales Cannon - "Eddie Escobar, an attorney representing Gonzales citizen Glenda Gordon" then followed by "“I also represent the museum district,” Escobar said. “We’re seeking a temporary injunction while this case is pending. That is the first step in this process.” - the case is the one Mrs Gordon has brought against the City of Gonzales, Mr. Lorenzo Hernandez (land owner), and the Recycle Center. Now why would Mr. Escobar represent a district that was in name only? No regulatory connotations what-so-ever? Why was it even mentioned in the lawsuit and the newspaper?
Out of curiosity this morning I decided to drive by for myself. The recycle center is a nice, clean business. Compared to the green giant that stands less than 2 blocks away, and right across from the park, this business looks like a surgical unit in it's cleanliness. Both recycling, one looks like the scrap yard, one looks like a welcome business in our community.
Then around backside of the recycling center on Darst is a house with "No Trespassing" signs, a garage that is falling down and cram packed with crap, fences down between the house and garage and their fence between them and the recycle center is falling down (I know this is their fence because I use to own that house and fence). The house has been vacant for years, and yet the ONLY person other than Mrs. Gordon that isn't paid to complain is the current owner of this house (note owner, not occupant, as they live in Smiley). Not the business that operates every day as a day care, not the apartment building across the street where people live, and the city has receive absolutely ZERO complaints on this property for any violations what so ever, nor Mr. Sam Lewis from compliance control.
So first of all I want to know what the city council plans to do about this now regulatory designation of "Museum District". Personally I believe we were lied to as to the reason for it and it should be immediately removed from our books. I'm sick and tired of being lied to and anterior motives for things coming before our council. Remove the designation and forbid it from coming back to the council. We don't like liars and we were lied to about it.
In the past we've had a lot of complaints about Gonzales and the need to recycle. We've got it, it's on St. Louis and working well. I've read recently where people are complaining that we need more work for our kids. Where do you think those come from? They come from new businesses!
We should be happy to see Mr. Peralez and his business come to town. We should be welcoming as many businesses like his, good community citizens, that are wanting to come to town.
Mrs Gordon can keep her museum district, we don't need it especially when it start infringing on property rights.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Now before these came to a vote by our council I asked Mr. Bob Burchard about this district. He very specifically told me that this was a name only designation, and would carry absolutely NO regulatory connotations to it. I told him I was concerned that this would be used to try to take away property owners rights in that district. "Absolutely not" was Mr. Burchards' response to me.
Later that night at that city council meeting Mrs Glenda Gordon told the council that this was purely a designation that would hold no regulatory connotations. There were several of the council members that weren't exactly for this designation, but felt that since it was purely in name only it would be ok. This then would go to our state legislators so that we would be designated the first "museum district" in Texas. What a great marketing campaign. That's ALL it was suppose to be, a marketing ploy!
So I'm going to just put it as clear as I can, we were lied to! Mrs. Gordon, the same person who brought this designation to the council, has since used the museum district designation to try to close down a new business in that district, the recycling center on St. Louis.
Per the Gonzales Cannon - "Eddie Escobar, an attorney representing Gonzales citizen Glenda Gordon" then followed by "“I also represent the museum district,” Escobar said. “We’re seeking a temporary injunction while this case is pending. That is the first step in this process.” - the case is the one Mrs Gordon has brought against the City of Gonzales, Mr. Lorenzo Hernandez (land owner), and the Recycle Center. Now why would Mr. Escobar represent a district that was in name only? No regulatory connotations what-so-ever? Why was it even mentioned in the lawsuit and the newspaper?
Out of curiosity this morning I decided to drive by for myself. The recycle center is a nice, clean business. Compared to the green giant that stands less than 2 blocks away, and right across from the park, this business looks like a surgical unit in it's cleanliness. Both recycling, one looks like the scrap yard, one looks like a welcome business in our community.
Then around backside of the recycling center on Darst is a house with "No Trespassing" signs, a garage that is falling down and cram packed with crap, fences down between the house and garage and their fence between them and the recycle center is falling down (I know this is their fence because I use to own that house and fence). The house has been vacant for years, and yet the ONLY person other than Mrs. Gordon that isn't paid to complain is the current owner of this house (note owner, not occupant, as they live in Smiley). Not the business that operates every day as a day care, not the apartment building across the street where people live, and the city has receive absolutely ZERO complaints on this property for any violations what so ever, nor Mr. Sam Lewis from compliance control.
So first of all I want to know what the city council plans to do about this now regulatory designation of "Museum District". Personally I believe we were lied to as to the reason for it and it should be immediately removed from our books. I'm sick and tired of being lied to and anterior motives for things coming before our council. Remove the designation and forbid it from coming back to the council. We don't like liars and we were lied to about it.
In the past we've had a lot of complaints about Gonzales and the need to recycle. We've got it, it's on St. Louis and working well. I've read recently where people are complaining that we need more work for our kids. Where do you think those come from? They come from new businesses!
We should be happy to see Mr. Peralez and his business come to town. We should be welcoming as many businesses like his, good community citizens, that are wanting to come to town.
Mrs Gordon can keep her museum district, we don't need it especially when it start infringing on property rights.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
It a freaking blog!
I'm not sure why city council member and mayor have this 'only the holy few' can even run for office, and after all that's not me right?
I hear from several people that have opinions on EVERY agenda item that comes up. They need to run for mayor or council. I hear from people that have out of the box ideas for this city (you know like we actually should be bringing business TO Gonzales, not chasing them away), they should run for mayor or council. There are people that have some fiscal knowledge that this city could desperately use right now. They should be running for office. And while the 'total package' would be nice, I'm not sure who in Gonzales would have all those attributes.
If you've never run for office it's not a problem. There is no requirement to have been dog catcher before you run for mayor. Come by, I don't care who you are, I'd spend an evening with you and talk to you about running for an office and the basics of it. What you'll have to have, what you should do, what you can expect.
On a side note I don't know what's happened that some have had issues posting comments. I posted a fix to it on the previous blogs comments. I will put them at the bottom of this too. I have not blocked anyone from posting a comment on this blog.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Fix to not being able to post a comment:
Tools - Internet Options
Click on the "Privacy" tab.
Set the Privacy slider to "Medium".
Hit the "Advanced" button, and examine the "Advanced Privacy Settings".
Check “Override automatic cookie handling”
Click both "First party Cookies" and "Third party Cookies" should be set to "Accept"
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Nesser for Mayor
First of all it cost NOTHING to file to run for mayor or city council. There is no declaration of political party, it doesn't matter Democrat, Republican, Independent or Other, it doesn't go on the ballot anywhere. No certifications are needed, you don't even have to have a high school diploma, nothing! The only requirement is that you have been a citizen of Gonzales for the last 6 months. So running for mayor or city council is available for anyone in this city who is a resident. The only thing you have to do is declare with the City Secretary, and fill out some paperwork, bingo you're running for office.
Now we've got some talented people that don't necessarily want to be in politics but would make an excellent mayor. If you know someone in that category it's time to start talking seriously to them about We've got some people that I'm certain think they know it all that have their opportunity to show the city what they really know, you know put up or shut up (I'm certain many put me in this category). And yes, you'll have some with personal agendas run too, and the voters will have to sift through all the $#@! to figure out who really will be the best person for mayor. This should not be a one (wo)man race for either mayor or city council.
So if you think you might want to be mayor or council member, NOW is the time for you to start getting a team together. People who will talk you up. People willing to knock on doors with/for you. People to make you look good. A platform of things you'd like to see happen in the city would be a good start. What are your visions for the city? Get it together so you can convince the citizens to vote for you. And if you have a plan to get the citizens out to vote, that would work even better! You can't wait till May and expect this stuff to fall into place. You've got to start now.
If rumors are right we'll have 2 positions that will not have incumbents running. Nothing concrete, but I'd expect at least one, if not both, of the 2 Bobbys won't run again. So opportunity is there now for someone to step up. It's time we put some leadership into this city for growth, development of our current assets, and some fiscal responsibility. If you know someone who can do that for this city, now is the time to get their name out there!
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Vote on Property Taxes
The following is the except for tonight's called meeting. The first item on the agenda is your property tax rate for 2011. Now I don't care if you own, rent, or are passing through you pay these taxes. Either directly or through increased rents.
So far, only 1 person has spoken either for or against the increased taxes that are being proposed (not increase tax rate, but increase because of increased values on our properties), and that person was me. The council has a chance to vote for the 'effective tax rate' which will still increase the revenues for the city because of new businesses and houses without effecting the amount you paid this last year.
The county has actually LOWERED your taxes, so why does the city want to raise them?
So tonight come visit the council at their new time of 6:30.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
CITY OF GONZALES CALLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
6:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER AND INVOCATION
PUBLIC COMMENTS Pgs.
The public comments section of the meeting is for citizens to address the Mayor and Council (as a whole).
ORDINANCES
1. Discuss and Consider Ordinance #2011-20 for Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2011 Tax Rate 1-22. Discuss and Consider Ordinance #2011- 23 for Adoption of the Revised Drought Contingency Plan 3-34
RESOLUTIONS
3. Discuss and Consider Resolution #2011- 44 to Approve the Subdivision of Property 35-43
EXECUTIVE SESSION
4. Deliberation Regarding Real Property Under Government Code § 551.072
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
5. Discuss and Consider items listed in executive session as necessary.
ADJOURN
So far, only 1 person has spoken either for or against the increased taxes that are being proposed (not increase tax rate, but increase because of increased values on our properties), and that person was me. The council has a chance to vote for the 'effective tax rate' which will still increase the revenues for the city because of new businesses and houses without effecting the amount you paid this last year.
The county has actually LOWERED your taxes, so why does the city want to raise them?
So tonight come visit the council at their new time of 6:30.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
CITY OF GONZALES CALLED CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
6:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER AND INVOCATION
PUBLIC COMMENTS Pgs.
The public comments section of the meeting is for citizens to address the Mayor and Council (as a whole).
ORDINANCES
1. Discuss and Consider Ordinance #2011-20 for Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2011 Tax Rate 1-22. Discuss and Consider Ordinance #2011- 23 for Adoption of the Revised Drought Contingency Plan 3-34
RESOLUTIONS
3. Discuss and Consider Resolution #2011- 44 to Approve the Subdivision of Property 35-43
EXECUTIVE SESSION
4. Deliberation Regarding Real Property Under Government Code § 551.072
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
5. Discuss and Consider items listed in executive session as necessary.
ADJOURN
Scout Sign Up in Gonzales
Just a bit off note, tonight is sign up for all scouting in Gonzales. If you have a girl from kindergarten to 21 years old, or a boy from first grade through 21 we have an adventure for them.
In a joint venture all scouts have come together with a website www.gonzalesscouting.com. It describes all the types of scouting in Gonzales.
We have Girl Scouts, Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, and now Venturing for co-ed high adventure all in Gonzales.
So if you have a child and want to see them in a great organization that will keep them active and learning great leadership skills, bring them tonight to Gonzales Elementary between 6 and 7:30 for sign up.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
In a joint venture all scouts have come together with a website www.gonzalesscouting.com. It describes all the types of scouting in Gonzales.
We have Girl Scouts, Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, and now Venturing for co-ed high adventure all in Gonzales.
So if you have a child and want to see them in a great organization that will keep them active and learning great leadership skills, bring them tonight to Gonzales Elementary between 6 and 7:30 for sign up.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)