In my house hold I make rules. Now anyone who has kids know the routine. You make a rule, it goes along for a bit, then all of a sudden the rule has been forgotten. "I didn't know that was a rule", or "I forgot that was a rule".
I saw that happen at city council on Monday night.
Council made a rule about a year ago that they wanted ALL board vacancies to be posted in the newspaper of record, followed by applications being taken, and then the council would decide who would be appointed.
The last 2 times someone has vacated the city manager has brought a name to the council prior to the procedures being followed. Last time they tabled the appointment so that the proper procedures could be taken. This time they (the council) let the kids make the rules. Why bother having rules and procedures if you're going to circumvent them at every opportunity?
Now I have a couple of points on this.
1) What's the rush? A single vacancy on any given board can wait a month or two and not stop business from happening.
2) Why didn't the council just table this like they did last time?
3) What are we afraid of by following the rules? That 'one of the boys' won't be selected? The person selected might be the best person for the job. But after talking to some of the council members no one has a clue who she was, so how can we know because no application was filled out, and not ads were put out.
I believe Mr Barnes when he states he wants transparency in our city government, but he's failed here. Transparency is allowing the ENTIRE community getting involved by asking those who are interested in a specific board know that there is a vacancy. Not allowing the 'good old boy' get selected to the board because of who they know.
Additionally I've mentioned that when they put their ads in the paper that it specifically states what boards have vacancies. NO ONE is going to apply to "join a committee or board" ad. They will join a "Library Board" or "Cemetery Board" or other board that they have interest in. That's simple marketing 101.
Second item that bugged me was that Mayor Logan was trying to make a statement of fact in response to a public comment made. Our city attorney, Jackie Williamson, stopped him in his tracks and told him they were not allowed to speak during the public comment section.
WRONG!
I get so upset when either "we've always done it that way" or we just don't know the real answer so we make up a 'safe' answer to look like we do know what we're talking about.
I wish to quote the Texas State 2012 Open Meetings Handbook (Pg 41).
The Act permits a member of the public or a member of the governmental body to raise a subject
that has not been included in the notice for the meeting, but any discussion of the subject must be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a future meeting. Section 551.042 of the
Act provides for this procedure:
(a) If, at a meeting of a governmental body, a member of the public or of the
governmental body inquires about a subject for which notice has not been
given as required by this subchapter, the notice provisions of this subchapter
do not apply to:
(1) a statement of specific factual information given in response
to the inquiry; or
(2) a recitation of existing policy in response to the inquiry.
(b) Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of the inquiry shall be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent
meeting.214
Mayor Logan was trying to do just that, make a statement of fact, that there was already a law covering the problem in question. Nothing more.
Third, anyone who knows Mike Hanson knows he's loud and he's not a smooth speaker, but even in his boisterous way he sometimes has valid points. During the meeting the council decided to go to month stays at JB Wells for the trailers. Mr Hanson asked the city attorney if that meant that the city would have to start going through court instead of using the police to evict people when necessary. Jackie wouldn't answer Mr. Hanson. Well the fact is he had a good question and none of the council members turned to her asking for the answer. Instead they voted 'aye' to the amendment without all the answers. So the question is still out there, will we have to start going through court to evict people from JB Wells now?
I will give Mr Barnes a thumbs up on one of the points that Mr. Hanson made that SHOULD of been answered during the Public Comments. Mr. Hanson made the point that many of the agenda items are vague or make no sense unless you have background information on the item, and it was no fair that we as citizens didn't know what they were going to talk about. For those who don't know, about 3 months ago Mr Barnes has had the city secretary started posting the entire booklet that the city council receives online. This is generally right above or right below the agenda announcement. This last week it was 122 pages and in Adobe format. **Note - If for some really odd reason you don't have Adobe reader you may download it here free ** It has background information, backup documentation (sometime to excess), recommendations, actions that would be taken, cost, budget information, and more. I highly recommend people start reading these even if they don't print them out.
Note - I print these out 2 to a page and double sided for my personal use, it's easy to do in Adobe and allows you to read at your leisure without waiting 122 pages.
This weeks meeting had a 2 page agenda, and we didn't get out till 8 PM. I understand that the meeting was long, but we don't stop asking question if that's what it takes to get the right answers so we make informed decisions. It was almost as if some of the council were afraid of asking the obvious questions in fear of making the meeting 10 minutes longer. We had a full house in the seats and those citizens who took the time to attend and be part of our city processes deserved the right to hear answers to valid questions. After all the council is there for the citizens.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Two issues:
ReplyDelete1. The website has changed. You have to search for the "Agendas and Meetings". It used to be right there when you accessed the website. Where is it? You have to to go "Government" and then you will find it.
2. Accessing "Agendas and Meetings" I find only the 2-page agenda of the meeting. No 122 page detail.
Donald,
ReplyDeleteYou're right, the new website isn't updated with all the old stuff yet. It will have the new information before the next meeting.
On the new website ONLY from the home page (this is being fixed) you click on Government and then Public notices.
If you'd like to see what was there go to http://216.177.171.196/PubNotices/ and you'll see what was there. The first entry is the one you want.
And as of today's date, November 14, it still isn't up and running correctly.
ReplyDeleteNo minutes from the 11/6 meeting.
And check out the Nov 23 meeting agenda for Main Street. I don't think there is a meeting the day after Thanksgiving. And the agenda is last months.
Anyone see the ad in this weeks Cannon? A call for a Main Street Committee member!!! YES!! Applications are being taken now.
ReplyDeleteIt CAN be done, and it CAN be done right!!!!
Now if you're interested in being on the Main Street Committee (one of my favorite committees in Gonzales) get your application in ASAP!