This has not been an easy weekend for me. It's been Veterans Day
2012 weekend. I've attended 3 events with the Boy Scouts for Veterans
Day. For those who don't know it's the 50th anniversary of the start of
the Vietnam War this year. But that's not what has been so tough on
me.
I've never really cared much for Veterans Day. I feel uncomfortable receiving
recognition for not being extraordinary. My generation had a few
skirmishes and the start of Desert Storm, but I didn't have to go
through a WWII. I wasn't rejected as the Vietnam Veterans were on their
return. And I never saw terrorist actions like the young men in
Afghanistan or the middle east. So I'd much rather the attention go to
those that do deserve it.
But this year Taps has a more eerie sound for me. It's always struck a chord in my heart, but this year, 2012, it's shook me to the core every time I've heard it. You see, this is the first Veterans Day since one of the heros
of WWII passed away, my grandfather Capt. William F. Nesser. He wasn't
in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines or Coast Guard. He was in the
Merchant Marines. He went where our Coast Guard and Navy wouldn't even
think of going. His command went to Russia and points between where
u-boats were peppering the waters.
I remember back in
the 80's when the Government recognized the Merchant Marines, my
grandfather was elated to hold the title of veteran. He received medals
from the governments of France and Russia for his efforts in delivering
goods to their countries, but the thing he was proudest of was his
DD214 releasing him from military service and making him a veteran. At
his funeral the Navy played taps and handed the family a flag in his
honor. He deserved every bit of it.
Recently the
WWII museum in New Orleans had a display of my grandfathers maritime goods from
his time in service and travels around the world. The article is here if you're interested in reading about him and the museum.
Just weeks before
he passed away they spent a day interviewing him about his adventures.
The stories I heard over the last 20 or so years about trips to Russia,
watching explosions on the horizon as his buddies ships were blown up
and watching them sink, politics over where the cargo ships were to go,
and many others are held for my childrens children to remember what this
man was part of. I'm sure I've forgotten as many stories as I
remember, but I remember many of them.
WWII vets are becoming
fewer and fewer. My grandfather was 92, and he was a young man when the
war started. If you know a veteran, especially a WWII veteran, make
sure you take the time and listen to them. Hear their stories of
adventure of battles and sorrow of losses of their best friends. It's
time you'll never regret. And honestly I can't think of anything a
veteran would want more than to spend a few minutes telling another
generation of their hardships and their victories. It really is a great way to pay honor and tribute for all they went through.
God
Bless, and may He guide our country and put a protective hand over all
the young men and women still in harms way protecting our freedoms.
Dennis Nesser
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Following the Rules
In my house hold I make rules. Now anyone who has kids know the routine. You make a rule, it goes along for a bit, then all of a sudden the rule has been forgotten. "I didn't know that was a rule", or "I forgot that was a rule".
I saw that happen at city council on Monday night.
Council made a rule about a year ago that they wanted ALL board vacancies to be posted in the newspaper of record, followed by applications being taken, and then the council would decide who would be appointed.
The last 2 times someone has vacated the city manager has brought a name to the council prior to the procedures being followed. Last time they tabled the appointment so that the proper procedures could be taken. This time they (the council) let the kids make the rules. Why bother having rules and procedures if you're going to circumvent them at every opportunity?
Now I have a couple of points on this.
1) What's the rush? A single vacancy on any given board can wait a month or two and not stop business from happening.
2) Why didn't the council just table this like they did last time?
3) What are we afraid of by following the rules? That 'one of the boys' won't be selected? The person selected might be the best person for the job. But after talking to some of the council members no one has a clue who she was, so how can we know because no application was filled out, and not ads were put out.
I believe Mr Barnes when he states he wants transparency in our city government, but he's failed here. Transparency is allowing the ENTIRE community getting involved by asking those who are interested in a specific board know that there is a vacancy. Not allowing the 'good old boy' get selected to the board because of who they know.
Additionally I've mentioned that when they put their ads in the paper that it specifically states what boards have vacancies. NO ONE is going to apply to "join a committee or board" ad. They will join a "Library Board" or "Cemetery Board" or other board that they have interest in. That's simple marketing 101.
Second item that bugged me was that Mayor Logan was trying to make a statement of fact in response to a public comment made. Our city attorney, Jackie Williamson, stopped him in his tracks and told him they were not allowed to speak during the public comment section.
WRONG!
I get so upset when either "we've always done it that way" or we just don't know the real answer so we make up a 'safe' answer to look like we do know what we're talking about.
I wish to quote the Texas State 2012 Open Meetings Handbook (Pg 41).
The Act permits a member of the public or a member of the governmental body to raise a subject
that has not been included in the notice for the meeting, but any discussion of the subject must be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a future meeting. Section 551.042 of the
Act provides for this procedure:
(a) If, at a meeting of a governmental body, a member of the public or of the
governmental body inquires about a subject for which notice has not been
given as required by this subchapter, the notice provisions of this subchapter
do not apply to:
(1) a statement of specific factual information given in response
to the inquiry; or
(2) a recitation of existing policy in response to the inquiry.
(b) Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of the inquiry shall be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent
meeting.214
Mayor Logan was trying to do just that, make a statement of fact, that there was already a law covering the problem in question. Nothing more.
Third, anyone who knows Mike Hanson knows he's loud and he's not a smooth speaker, but even in his boisterous way he sometimes has valid points. During the meeting the council decided to go to month stays at JB Wells for the trailers. Mr Hanson asked the city attorney if that meant that the city would have to start going through court instead of using the police to evict people when necessary. Jackie wouldn't answer Mr. Hanson. Well the fact is he had a good question and none of the council members turned to her asking for the answer. Instead they voted 'aye' to the amendment without all the answers. So the question is still out there, will we have to start going through court to evict people from JB Wells now?
I will give Mr Barnes a thumbs up on one of the points that Mr. Hanson made that SHOULD of been answered during the Public Comments. Mr. Hanson made the point that many of the agenda items are vague or make no sense unless you have background information on the item, and it was no fair that we as citizens didn't know what they were going to talk about. For those who don't know, about 3 months ago Mr Barnes has had the city secretary started posting the entire booklet that the city council receives online. This is generally right above or right below the agenda announcement. This last week it was 122 pages and in Adobe format. **Note - If for some really odd reason you don't have Adobe reader you may download it here free ** It has background information, backup documentation (sometime to excess), recommendations, actions that would be taken, cost, budget information, and more. I highly recommend people start reading these even if they don't print them out.
Note - I print these out 2 to a page and double sided for my personal use, it's easy to do in Adobe and allows you to read at your leisure without waiting 122 pages.
This weeks meeting had a 2 page agenda, and we didn't get out till 8 PM. I understand that the meeting was long, but we don't stop asking question if that's what it takes to get the right answers so we make informed decisions. It was almost as if some of the council were afraid of asking the obvious questions in fear of making the meeting 10 minutes longer. We had a full house in the seats and those citizens who took the time to attend and be part of our city processes deserved the right to hear answers to valid questions. After all the council is there for the citizens.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
I saw that happen at city council on Monday night.
Council made a rule about a year ago that they wanted ALL board vacancies to be posted in the newspaper of record, followed by applications being taken, and then the council would decide who would be appointed.
The last 2 times someone has vacated the city manager has brought a name to the council prior to the procedures being followed. Last time they tabled the appointment so that the proper procedures could be taken. This time they (the council) let the kids make the rules. Why bother having rules and procedures if you're going to circumvent them at every opportunity?
Now I have a couple of points on this.
1) What's the rush? A single vacancy on any given board can wait a month or two and not stop business from happening.
2) Why didn't the council just table this like they did last time?
3) What are we afraid of by following the rules? That 'one of the boys' won't be selected? The person selected might be the best person for the job. But after talking to some of the council members no one has a clue who she was, so how can we know because no application was filled out, and not ads were put out.
I believe Mr Barnes when he states he wants transparency in our city government, but he's failed here. Transparency is allowing the ENTIRE community getting involved by asking those who are interested in a specific board know that there is a vacancy. Not allowing the 'good old boy' get selected to the board because of who they know.
Additionally I've mentioned that when they put their ads in the paper that it specifically states what boards have vacancies. NO ONE is going to apply to "join a committee or board" ad. They will join a "Library Board" or "Cemetery Board" or other board that they have interest in. That's simple marketing 101.
Second item that bugged me was that Mayor Logan was trying to make a statement of fact in response to a public comment made. Our city attorney, Jackie Williamson, stopped him in his tracks and told him they were not allowed to speak during the public comment section.
WRONG!
I get so upset when either "we've always done it that way" or we just don't know the real answer so we make up a 'safe' answer to look like we do know what we're talking about.
I wish to quote the Texas State 2012 Open Meetings Handbook (Pg 41).
The Act permits a member of the public or a member of the governmental body to raise a subject
that has not been included in the notice for the meeting, but any discussion of the subject must be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a future meeting. Section 551.042 of the
Act provides for this procedure:
(a) If, at a meeting of a governmental body, a member of the public or of the
governmental body inquires about a subject for which notice has not been
given as required by this subchapter, the notice provisions of this subchapter
do not apply to:
(1) a statement of specific factual information given in response
to the inquiry; or
(2) a recitation of existing policy in response to the inquiry.
(b) Any deliberation of or decision about the subject of the inquiry shall be
limited to a proposal to place the subject on the agenda for a subsequent
meeting.214
Mayor Logan was trying to do just that, make a statement of fact, that there was already a law covering the problem in question. Nothing more.
Third, anyone who knows Mike Hanson knows he's loud and he's not a smooth speaker, but even in his boisterous way he sometimes has valid points. During the meeting the council decided to go to month stays at JB Wells for the trailers. Mr Hanson asked the city attorney if that meant that the city would have to start going through court instead of using the police to evict people when necessary. Jackie wouldn't answer Mr. Hanson. Well the fact is he had a good question and none of the council members turned to her asking for the answer. Instead they voted 'aye' to the amendment without all the answers. So the question is still out there, will we have to start going through court to evict people from JB Wells now?
I will give Mr Barnes a thumbs up on one of the points that Mr. Hanson made that SHOULD of been answered during the Public Comments. Mr. Hanson made the point that many of the agenda items are vague or make no sense unless you have background information on the item, and it was no fair that we as citizens didn't know what they were going to talk about. For those who don't know, about 3 months ago Mr Barnes has had the city secretary started posting the entire booklet that the city council receives online. This is generally right above or right below the agenda announcement. This last week it was 122 pages and in Adobe format. **Note - If for some really odd reason you don't have Adobe reader you may download it here free ** It has background information, backup documentation (sometime to excess), recommendations, actions that would be taken, cost, budget information, and more. I highly recommend people start reading these even if they don't print them out.
Note - I print these out 2 to a page and double sided for my personal use, it's easy to do in Adobe and allows you to read at your leisure without waiting 122 pages.
This weeks meeting had a 2 page agenda, and we didn't get out till 8 PM. I understand that the meeting was long, but we don't stop asking question if that's what it takes to get the right answers so we make informed decisions. It was almost as if some of the council were afraid of asking the obvious questions in fear of making the meeting 10 minutes longer. We had a full house in the seats and those citizens who took the time to attend and be part of our city processes deserved the right to hear answers to valid questions. After all the council is there for the citizens.
God Bless,
Dennis Nesser
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)